Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Peter Heller vs Abel Forger Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Heller vs Forger analysis and find out who is favored!
Peter Heller vs Abel Forger Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Heller 1 - 0 Forger
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Heller has won 51.03% of points on their second serve, while Forger has won 48.67%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Heller, in recent form, has won 50.26% of their opponent's second serve points, while Forger has won 54.48%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.57% and 39.92% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Heller has saved 56.8% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Forger has saved 41.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Heller has won 66.04% of matches played (W/L 35/ 18), with Forger winning 33.33% (W/L 5/ 10) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Heller has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 308/ 161), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 50% (W/L 9/ 9). Forger has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Heller has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.09% of matches (W/L 32/ 15), where as Forger has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 5/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Heller winning 1 times and Forger being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Heller winning 2 and Forger winning 0. The last match between Heller and Forger was at the M15 Eupen, 10-08-2023, Second, Clay with Peter Heller getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:25:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Heller and Forger have played a deciding set 0 times, with Heller winning 0 times and Forger 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Heller winning 0, and Forger 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Heller has played against opponents with an average rank of 205.94 while Forger has played against players with an average rank of 129.33.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Heller has won 63% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Forger has won 40% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Heller has converted 45.79% of breakpoint opportunities, and Forger has converted 53.85% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
517
Rank
271
High
31
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
18
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
64% (437-247)
Career Total W/L
29% (5-12)
65% (15-8)
YTD W/L
50% (3-3)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Peter Heller | Abel Forger |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:25:0 | 1:25:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (29/44) | 63% (33/52) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 72% (21/29) | 55% (18/33) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 60% (9/15) | 32% (6/19) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 42% (5/12) | 100% (2/2) |
| Return Points W% | 54% (28/52) | 32% (14/44) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Peter Heller
Player
Abel Forger
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
63%
(
33 of
52)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
21 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
28 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
38
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Peter Heller | Abel Forger |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 65% (15/8) | 50% (3/3) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 58% (32/23) | 46% (6/7) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (282/249) | 50% (57/56) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 65% (15/8) | 50% (1/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.29 | 0.16 |
| Aces Total | 76 | 9 |
| DFs per game | 0.13 | 0.5 |
| DFs Total | 35 | 28 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:2:59 | 1:39:10 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 176.65 | 144.5 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (950/1677) | 59% (218/368) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (651/950) | 61% (133/218) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (371/727) | 49% (73/150) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (87/190) | 54% (21/39) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (736/1734) | 45% (168/372) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 60% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (12/6) | 50% (3/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (15/23) | 50% (3/6) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 78% (7/9) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (12/11) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (12/1) | 0% (2/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 36% (11/4) | 25% (4/1) |
Peter Heller Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Jan Choinski
Player
Peter Heller
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
36 of
61)
1
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
80%
(
12 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Heller
Player
Rudolf Molleker
49%
(
47 of
96)
1st Serve %
50%
(
56 of
111)
9
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
5
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
39 of
56)
57%
(
28 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
44 of
111)
106
Total Points Won
101
|
5-7 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Peter Heller
Player
Michael Geerts
54%
(
48 of
89)
1st Serve %
51%
(
46 of
91)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
40%
(
36 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
38 of
91)
91
Total Points Won
89
|
3-6 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Peter Heller
Player
Sandro Kopp
56%
(
56 of
100)
1st Serve %
62%
(
62 of
100)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
38 of
62)
39%
(
17 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
48%
(
48 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
47 of
100)
99
Total Points Won
101
|
0-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Orlando Luz
Player
Peter Heller
59%
(
54 of
91)
1st Serve %
61%
(
53 of
87)
6
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
65%
(
24 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
27 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
87)
95
Total Points Won
83
|
4-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Edas Butvilas
Player
Peter Heller
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Peter Heller
Player
Dominik Kellovsky
53%
(
47 of
89)
1st Serve %
80%
(
66 of
83)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
49 of
66)
60%
(
25 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
28 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
83)
89
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Heller
Player
Noah Perfetti
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
77%
(
65 of
84)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
81
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gabriele Maria Noce
Player
Peter Heller
63%
(
57 of
91)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
96)
2
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
2
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
53%
(
18 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
43%
(
39 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
96)
96
Total Points Won
91
|
6-3 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Peter Heller
Player
Guelfo Baldovinetti
48%
(
15 of
31)
1st Serve %
77%
(
43 of
56)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
87%
(
13 of
15)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
94%
(
15 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
10%
(
3 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Abel Forger Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Juan Bautista Otegui
Player
Abel Forger
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
19 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Abel Forger
Player
Cezar Gabriel Papoe
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
67%
(
38 of
57)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
31 of
57)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Abel Forger
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
63%
(
15 of
24)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
39%
(
17 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Abel Forger
Player
Samir Hamza Reguig
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
78)
3
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
4
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
43 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Joshua Sheehy
Player
Abel Forger
64%
(
41 of
64)
1st Serve %
61%
(
38 of
62)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
29 of
38)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Abel Forger
Player
Aliaksandr Liaonenka
67%
(
58 of
86)
1st Serve %
62%
(
51 of
82)
2
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
34 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
40 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bang Shuo Yin
Player
Abel Forger
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
9
84%
(
43 of
51)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
37 of
46)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
12 of
36)
10%
(
1 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
21%
(
14 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
33 of
82)
85
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Christoph Negritu
Player
Abel Forger
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
54%
(
35 of
65)
7
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
5
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
23 of
65)
76
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Abel Forger
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Abel Forger
Player
Cengiz Aksu
67%
(
64 of
96)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
91)
0
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
32 of
66)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
40 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
47 of
91)
103
Total Points Won
84
|
5-7 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Heller Vs Forger Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Heller are available here and Forger photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Abel Forger
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
